I agree that they be different but equal.I believe that both making a living and study to live are both forms of growth—they simply differ in approach. We should view them equally. In either form of learning, as long as you put your heart into it, you can achieve success.Education should not be an either-or choice. It should be a both-and situation. People have different strengths, interests, and life paths. Whatever suits you is the best.
教学团队
课程特色
视频(50)
练习(41)
作业(8)
考试(1)
最新学员
Unit 1 Theme Discussion
The author in the text seems to make a clear distinction between a vocational school and a university. One is for training, the other is for education; one is for making a living, the other is for learning to live.
Do you agree with the author when he seems to suggest that one is superior to the other? Can’t they be different but equal? Can’t this be a “both-and” question, instead of an “either-or” one?
78 回复
-
-
I don't think so.One equips people to make a living steadily, the other enriches how they live thoughtfully. They are not in a hierarchy; they are two parallel, indispensable paths for individual growth and social progress. A society needs both skilled technicians and thoughtful scholars.
Therefore, the distinction should not be interpreted as superiority or inferiority. They are simply different, but equal. -
I don't quite agree with the author's viewpoint. Education and making a living both hold equal weight in a person's life. Survival and living are not an either-or choice but different paths leading to a complete life.
-
I donot agree with this idea. Vocational schools and universities are different but equally important
.Vocational schools teach us practical skills to make a living, like how to do a specific job well. Universities teach us knowledge and thinking skills to understand the world and live a better life.
They don’t need to be compared as "better" or "worse". Some people need to learn skills first to support themselves, while others want to explore more ideas. It’s not an "either-or" choice—both are valuable and necessary.
-
I do not agree with the author's implication that one type of education is superior. Vocational colleges and universities should be in a different but equal relationship. This is a matter of "both", not "either-or". Vocational education and general higher education are complementary rather than opposing. They each have their own missions and values and should be treated equally. This is not a question of "which is better", but rather "how to enable everyone to find a growth path that suits them".
-
I do not believe there is any superiority between the two. While vocational universities focus more on vocational skills training, and universities offer courses designed to promote students' all-round development, neither is superior to the other. Each plays a distinct role and assumes different responsibilities in society. Whether we attend a vocational school or a university, we should attach equal importance to both vocational training and the improvement of our overall literacy.
-
-
I believe that vocational schools and universities are different but equal, and this is absolutely a "both-and" question rather than an "either-or" one.
Both are important for society. They are not better or worse; they are just different. We need both.
-
I don't agree with the author's viewpoint. I think both universities and vocational colleges play a very important role in today's society. Vocational colleges are mainly used to cultivate students' professional skills, while universities are mainly used to foster students' theoretical knowledge, enabling them to better master certain things. Both are making efforts for the future development of the country. Therefore, I believe that there is no situation where one exists due to the other; they are both used for their own development, as well as that of society and even the country in the future.
-
I don’t agree that one is superior to the other. Vocational schools equip students with practical skills to secure a livelihood, while universities cultivate critical thinking and broad knowledge to enrich life. They are different but equal, addressing distinct social needs. A "both-and" perspective is more rational, as both paths contribute to personal growth and societal development.
-
I disagree with the perspective of the author. No matter where you are, you can learn how to make a living as well as how to live. I think it all depends on you.With the rapid development of technology, you can learn everything you want and become the person you want to be if you make up your mind.So from my perspective, I don't think one is superior to the other. They may be different but equal. And I think their relationship is "both-and" instead of "either-or".
添加回复
您确定给 “0” 位老师发送协议吗？
UMOOCS用户服务协议
问题分类：
--
