第15次开课

开始:2025-08-25

截止:2026-01-15

课程已进行至

20/21周

成绩预发布时间 2026-01-14

教学团队

四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
副教授
四川外国语大学
教授
四川外国语大学
教授
四川外国语大学
讲师
讲师
四川外国语大学
讲师
四川外国语大学
讲师

课程特色

视频(28)
考试(25)
文档(3)
讨论(3)

Describe the 'Dao' in one word.

By 张婷 老师 11-30 1755次浏览

Please describe 'Dao' in one word. Also, consider: in what aspects does your chosen word fail to fully express the 'Dao'?
“用一个词描述‘道’。同时思考:你的这个词,在哪些方面无法完全表达‘道’?

318 回复

  • 6班贾晶雯 17天前

    everything,but it can not explain everything

    回复
  • 6班杨伟 15天前

    One word for "Dao" is Flux, yet this term only captures its dynamic, ever-changing side while failing to reflect its eternal, static essence and practical guidance for human lif

    回复
  • 李春生9班 14天前

    Freedom

    回复
  • 刘雨菡1班 6天前

    Ineffable

    回复
  • 吴静怡1班 5天前

    One Word for Dao: Unfathomable

    Limitations of This Word:Unfathomable emphasizes the incomprehensibility of Dao, but it neglects Dao’s active, generative nature—Dao is not just a mystery beyond human grasp, but the origin and driving force of all things .

    回复
  • 邓漫丽1班 3天前

    meta

    回复
  • 邓漫丽1班 3天前

    Maybe “way”

    1. Anthropocentrism: "Way" implies a path or method accessible to human understanding, whereas Dao transcends human conceptual frameworks and exists independently of perception.

    2. Overly Directive: Dao is not a prescribed route but the spontaneous, unfolding reality of all existence—both the journey and the non-journey.

    3. Static Connotation: While "Way" suggests a direction, Dao is fundamentally processual, encompassing both movement and stillness, form and formlessness.

    4. Reductive Scope: Dao is the source and sustenance of the cosmos (万物), the rhythmic pattern (理) of nature, and the ineffable mystery (玄) beyond being/non-being—far more than a "way."

    5. Lack of Paradox: The word cannot capture Dao's simultaneous immanence (in all things) and transcendence (beyond all things), nor its role as both creative principle and fertile void.

     

    As the Daodejing opens: "The Dao that can be spoken is not the eternal Dao." Any single word inevitably narrows its boundless, nameless nature.

     

    回复
  • 王紫柔16班 3天前

    Unity.

    • Limitations of the word: "Unity" reflects the Dao’s characteristic of connecting all things in the universe—all beings are part of the Dao’s whole, and there are no absolute separations (as Zhuangzi’s "all things are one" suggests). But this word fails to capture the Dao’s dynamic and changing nature: the Dao is not a static "unity" but a process of constant transformation and unfolding. Additionally, "unity" does not express the Dao’s role as the origin of the universe; it only describes the relational state of things under the Dao, not the Dao’s fundamental creative power.

    回复
  • 1班吕恬玲 2天前

    Process.

    But the word fails because Dao is not merely a sequence of changes but the origin and stillness enabling all process. It encompasses what does not process—the eternal, ineffable source. "Process" implies a knowable mechanism, while Dao transcends rational comprehension. It also fails to capture Dao's all-encompassing nature, which includes both action and non-action, being and non-being. Finally, "process" suggests linearity or purpose, whereas Dao is undirected, spontaneous, and without intent, like nature's unnamable flow. Thus, the term reduces the boundless, paradoxical unity of Dao to a single, limited aspect of its manifestation.

    回复

添加回复