第7次开课

开始:2020-09-14

截止:2020-12-31

课程已进行至

16/16周

成绩预发布时间 2020-12-29

期末考试截止时间 未设置

教学团队

西南大学
西南大学
西南大学
西南大学
教授
西南大学
副教授
西南大学
西南大学
西南大学
西南大学
西南大学
讲师
西南大学
西南大学
讲师
西南大学
助教
西南大学
助教
西南大学
助教

课程特色

视频(58)
讨论(10)
考试(13)
下载资料(12)

conclusion of this lecture

By Chloe 2020-12-24 190次浏览 课时20

The final part of this lecture is not very clear to me. The concept map for morpheme could be organised in a better way by seperating the four morphemes at the bottom layer into two groups; while the explanation for inflectional morphemes seems to be drafted in haste. 

It contains grammatical terms that have not been explained before and might be misleading as some of the rules might not apply in English. For example, in English the mood of verbs are realised by adding modal verb or auxiliary, the verb itself does not inflect, but in Japanese a change in suffix can show mood, like 行く(go)、行きたい(want to go) or 行かなければならない(must go). 

It also claims that a noun, pronoun or adjective has number, gender or case. I guess English (not like French) does not have case for nouns, but we do use -er and -ess to differentiate female from male. This pair is not inluded in the eight inflections.  In addition, personal pronouns can be inflected (like they and them), but according to this lecture they are treated as stand-alone pronouns belonging to "functional morphemes". As free morphemes and bound morphemes are mutually exclusive, the conclusion appears quite odd to me.

0 所有答案

  • 还没有答案,赶快添加一个吧!

添加答案